Description
Molgula manhattensis was described from Manhatten Island NY by De Kay in 1843 (DeKay 1843), but it was collected earlier by Couthouy (1988) and Gould (1841) near Boston. It was described as a new species (Ascidia ampulloides) from Europe in 1844. The extent of its European range is uncertain, depending on whether one considers M. tubifera and/or M. socialis to be synomyms of M. manhattensis. If these are regarded all as conspecific, then M. manhattensis ranges from Portugal to the White Sea, in relatively undisturbed habitats and in port environments (Van Name 1945; Carlton 2001 personal communication). If these species are treated as distinct, then M. manhattensis' range in Europe appears to be confined to scattered populations in brackish harbors (Monniot 1969). Gretchen Lambert (personal communication 2002) considers this taxonomic question to be unresolved.
Taxonomy
Kingdom | Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Animalia | Chordata | Ascidiacea | Stolidobranchia | Molgulidae | Molgula |
Synonyms
Invasion History
Chesapeake Bay Status
First Record | Population | Range | Introduction | Residency | Source Region | Native Region | Vectors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1912 | Established | Stable | Native | Regular Resident | Western Atlantic | Eastern Atlantic | Shipping(Fouling Community) |
History of Spread
Molgula manhattensis (Sea Grapes) was described from Manhatten Island NY by De Kay in 1843 (DeKay 1843), but it was collected earlier by Gould (1841) near Boston, and earlier still by Couthouy, 1838, also from Massachusetts (Van Name 1912). It was described as a new species from Europe in 1844. Some authors have considered it synonymous with M. tubifera and M. socialis, which would gives it a wide range, from Portugal to the White Sea (Van Name 1945; Carlton 2001 personal communication), while others considered it a distinct, introduced species, confined to scattered European ports (Monniot 1969). Recent genetic analysis indicate that M. mollgula is native to the northwest Atlantic, but that M. socialis is a distinct species (Haydar et al. 2010). In the northwest Atlantic, M. manhattensis occurs from the Northwest Atlantic to LA and Northeast TX (Van Name 1921; Van Name 1946; Gosner 1978; McDougall 1943). It was reported from several locations on the East Coast, from Boston to North Carolina in the 19th century (Gould 1841; DeKay 1843; Perkins 1871; Gould 1870; Verrill and Smith 1873); By the early 20th century, it was known over its present range on the Atlantic coast of North America (Van Name 1921).
This tunicate's several invasions in the Pacific suggest that could have been introduced within the Atlantic basin as well, from Europe to North America or vice versa. Recent genetic analysis supports native status in the northwest Atlantic, and introduced status in European Atlantic ports, Japan, San Francisco Bay, and the Black Sea (Haydar et al. 2010).
Molgula manhattensis has been introduced to the Pacific coast of North America, from Newport Beach (Lambert and Lambert 1998) to Puget Sound (Cohen and Carlton 1995; Cohen et al. 1998), to Japan (Asakura 1992), and Australia (Hewitt et al. 1999).
No ascidians were mentioned in an early report of Chesapeake Bay invertebrates from Fort Wool VA in 1878 (Uhler and Lugger 1878). M. manhattensis was reported from the mouth of the Patapsco River by Van Name (1912), and was also collected in the Bureau of Fisheries Survey of 1916-1922, which involved dredging primarily in the mainstem of the Bay. It was found to be 'widely distributed over the northen half of the Bay', and was taken in largest numbers between the Patapsco River and Kent Island. This tunicate was rare below the mouth of the Potomac and absent below the Rappahannock (Cowles et al. 1930). However, in 1978, it was abundant in lower cross-Bay transects near the mouth of the Piankatank, and from New Point Comfort to Cape Charles (Dauer et al. 1984). In shallower water, its range appears to be more widespread, and ranges from mesohaline tributaries to the mouth of the Bay.
Here are selected locality records:
Lower Bay- Virginia Beach/VA/Lynnhaven Bay (Ferguson and Jones 1949; Otsuka and Dauer 1982).
James River- Wreck Shoal-Newport News/VA/James River (Larsen 1985).
York River- Gloucester Point-Norfolk/VA/Hampton Roads-York River (Andrews 1956; Wass 1963; Andrews 1973; Marsh 1973; Dauer et al. 1984).
Potomac River- Cobb Island-Point Lookout/MD-VA/Potomac River (Frey 1946).
Middle Bay- Cambridge/MD/Choptank River (Humphries et al. 1985); Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant/MD/Chesapeake Bay (Abbe 1987).
Patuxent River- Eagle Harbor-Solomons Island/MD/Patuxent River (Merrill and Boss 1966; Cory 1967).
Upper Bay- Baltimore/MD/Patapsco River (Van Name (1912); MD-VA/'northern half of the Chesapeake Bay (Patapsco River mouth-Potomac river mouth) (Cowles 1930); MD/Severn River (Ruiz et al. unpublished data).
History References- Abbe 1987; Andrews 1956; Andrews 1973; Asakura 1992; Calder and Brehmer 1972; Carlton 2001 personal communication; Cohen and Carlton 1995; Cohen et al. 1998; Cory 1967; Cowles 1930; DeKay 1843; Ferguson and Jones 1949; Frey 1946; Gosner 1978; Gould 1841; Gould 1870; Hewitt et al. 1999; Humphries et al. 1985; Lambert and Lambert 1998; Larsen 1985; Marsh 1973; McDougall 1943; Merrill and Boss 1966; Monniot 1969; Otsuka and Dauer 1982; Perkins 1871; Uhler and Lugger 1878; Van Name 1912; Van Name 1921; Van Name 1945; Verrill and Smith 1873; Wass 1963
Invasion Comments
Ecology
Environmental Tolerances
For Survival | For Reproduction | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum | Maximum | Minimum | Maximum | |
Temperature (ºC) | ||||
Salinity (‰) | 10.0 | 35.0 | ||
Oxygen | hypoxic | |||
pH | ||||
Salinity Range | meso-eu |
Age and Growth
Male | Female | |
---|---|---|
Minimum Adult Size (mm) | 10.0 | 10.0 |
Typical Adult Size (mm) | 10.0 | 10.0 |
Maximum Adult Size (mm) | 35.0 | 35.0 |
Maximum Longevity (yrs) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Typical Longevity (yrs | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Reproduction
Start | Peak | End | |
---|---|---|---|
Reproductive Season | |||
Typical Number of Young Per Reproductive Event |
|||
Sexuality Mode(s) | |||
Mode(s) of Asexual Reproduction |
|||
Fertilization Type(s) | |||
More than One Reproduction Event per Year |
|||
Reproductive Startegy | |||
Egg/Seed Form |
Impacts
Economic Impacts in Chesapeake Bay
In middle and lower portions of Chesapeake Bay; Molgula manhattensis (Sea Grapes) is one of the dominant fouling organisms.
Boating - Molgula manhattensis is an important ship-fouling organism (Lippson and Lippson 1984; Millar 1971;Visscher 1927).
Fisheries- M. manhattensis is regarded as a serious fouler of oyster cultch (empty shells, placed to encourage spat settlement) and living oysters (Andrews 1953; Andrews 1973).
References - Andrews 1953; Andrews 1973; Lippson and Lippson 1984; Millar 1971
Economic Impacts Outside of Chesapeake Bay
Throughout its range, Molgula manhattensis (Sea Grapes) is regarded as one of the most troubling fouling organisms (Lippson and Lippson 1984; Millar 1971;Visscher 1927).
References- Lippson and Lippson 1984; Millar 1971;Visscher 1927
Ecological Impacts on Chesapeake Native Species
In middle and lower portions of Chesapeake Bay, Molgula manhattensis (Sea Grapes) is one of the dominant fouling organisms.
Competition- Molgula manhattensis is capable of rapidly settling on and overgrowing most other fouling community organisms (Andrews 1953; Calder and Brehmer 1967; Otsuka and Dauer 1982). It frequently attains 100% cover on settling plates (Otsuka and Dauer 1982; Ruiz et al. unpublished data). M. manhattensis is regarded as a serious fouler of oyster cultch (empty shells, placed to encourage spat settlement) and living oysters (Andrews 1953; Andrews 1973).
Habitat Change- The rapid growth of Molgula manhattensis greatly alters fouled surfaces, by covering them with multiple layers of tunicates ~10-20 mm deep. This is likely to inhibit settlement of many other organisms (Osman and Whitlach 1995). However, hydroids, Polydora spp., Corophium spp. (and related genera), and bryozoans do settle on its tunic (Otsuka and Dauer 1982), and the presence of M. manhattensis did not affect recruitment on adjacent bare surfaces (Osman and Whitlach 1995).
References- Andrews 1953; Andrews 1973; Calder and Brehmer 1967; Osman and Whitlach 1995; Otsuka and Dauer 1982; Ruiz et al. unpublished data
Ecological Impacts on Other Chesapeake Non-Native Species
In middle and lower portions of Chesapeake Bay; Molgula manhattensis (Sea Grapes) is one of the dominant fouling organisms.
Competition- Molgula manhattensis competes for space with the introduced Botryllus schlosseri (Golden Star Tunicate) (Otsuka and Dauer 1982; Osman and Whitlach 1995) and probably also with other introduced fouling organisms such as the tubeworm Ficopomatus enigmaticus (Ruiz et al., unpublished data).
References- Osman and Whitlach 1995; Otsuka and Dauer 1982
References
Abbe, George R. (1987) Epifauna, In: Heck, Kenneth L.(Eds.) Ecological studies in the middle reach of Chesapeake Bay- Calvert Cliffs. , Berlin. Pp. 82-91Andrews, J. D. (1953) Fouling organisms of Chesapeake Bay, , Baltimore, Maryland. Pp.
Andrews, Jay D. (1973) Effect of tropical storm Agnes on epifaunal invertebrates in Virginia estuaries, Chesapeake Science 14: 223-234
Asakura, A. (1992) Recent introductions of marine benthos into Tokyo Bay (review): Process of invasion into an urban ecosystem with discussion on the factors inducing their successful introduction, Journal of the Natural History Museum and Institute, Chiba 2: 1-14
Calder, Dale R. (1972) Phylum Cnidaria, Special Scientific Report, Virginia Institute of Marine Science 65: 97-102
Calder, Dale R.; Brehmer, Morris L. (1967) Seasonal occurrence of epifauna on test panels in Hampton Roads, Virginia., International Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 1: 149-164
Cohen, Andrew N.; Carlton, James T. (1995) Nonindigenous aquatic species in a United States estuary: a case study of the biological invasions of the San Francisco Bay and Delta, , Washington DC, Silver Spring MD.. Pp.
Cohen, Andrew; and 16 authors. (1998) Puget Sound expedition: a rapid assessment survey of non-indigenous species in the shallow waters of Puget Sound., , Olympia, Washington. Pp. 1-37
Cory, Robert L. (1967) Epifauna of the Patuxent River Estuary, Chesapeake Science 8: 71-89
Couthouy, Joseph P. (1838) Descriptions of new species of Mollusca and shells, and remarks on several polypi found in Massachusetts Bay, Boston Journal of Natural History 2: 53-111
Cowles, R.P. (1930) A biological study of the offshore waters of Chesapeake Bay, United States Bureau of Fisheries Bulletin 46: 277-381
De Kay, James E. (1843) Mollusca, Vol. 5, Zoology of New-York., In: (Eds.) Zoology of New-York. , Albany. Pp.
Ferguson, F. F.; Jones, E. R. (1949) A survey of the shoreline fauna of the Norfolk Peninsula., American Midland Naturalist : 436-446
Frey, David G. (1946) Oyster bars of the Potomac., United States Fish and Wildlife Service Special Scientific Report 32: 1-93
Gosner, Kenneth L. (1978) A field guide to the Atlantic seashore., In: (Eds.) . , Boston. Pp.
Gould, Augustus A. (1841) Report on the invertebrata of Massachusetts, comprising the Mollusca, Crustacea, Annelida, and Radiata., , Cambridge. Pp.
Grave, B. H. (1933) Rate of growth, age at sexual maturity, and duration of life of certain sessile organisms at Woods Hole, Massachusetts, Biological Bulletin 65: 375-386
Hewitt, C.L.; Campbell, M.L.; Thresher, R.E.; Martin, R.B. (1999) Marine Biological Invasions of Port Phillip Bay, Victoria, In: (Eds.) . , Hobart, Tasmania. Pp.
Humphries, Edythe M.; Duedall, Iver W.; Jordan, Stephen J. (1985) Coal-waste blocks as a fouling substrate in estuarine water., In: (Eds.) Energy Wastes in the Ocean. , New York. Pp. 613-649
Larsen, Peter F. (1985) The benthic fauna associated with the oyster reefs of the James River estuary, Virginia, U. S. A., Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie 70: 707-814
Lippson, Alice Jane; Lippson, Robert L. (1984) Life in the Chesapeake Bay, , Baltimore. Pp.
Marsh, G. Alex (1973) The Zostera epifaunal community in the York River, Virginia, Chesapeake Science 14: 87-97
McDougall, Kenneth D. (1943) Sessile marine invertebrates of Beaufort, N.C., Ecological Monographs 13: 321-374
Merrill, Arthur S.; Boss, Kenneth J. (1966) Benthic ecology and faunal change relating to oysters from a deep basin in the Lower Patuxent River, Maryland, Proceedings of the National Shellfisheries Association 56: 81-87
Millar, R.H. (1971) Ascidians as fouling organisms., In: Jones, E.B. Gareth; Eltringham S.K.(Eds.) Marine borers, fungi and fouling organisms of wood. , Brussels. Pp. 185-195
Monniot, Claude (1969) [The Molgulidae of European Seas] (French), Memoires du Museum d Histoire Naturelle 60: 172-272
Nauman, J. W.; Cory, R. L. (1969) Thermal additions and epifaunal organisms at Chalk Point, Maryland., Chesapeake Science 10: 218-226
Osman, Richard W.; Whitlatch, Robert B. (1995) The influence of resident adults on recruitment: a comparison to settlement., Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 190: 169-198
Otsuka, Cary M.; Dauer, Daniel M. (1982) Fouling community dynamics in Lynnhaven Bay., Estuaries 5: 10-22
Sagasti, Alexandra; Schaffner, Linda G.; Duffy, J. Emmett (2000) Epifaunal communities thrive in an estuary with hypoxic epsiodes., Estuaries 23: 474-487
Uhler, P. R. (1878) List of animals observed at Fort Wool, Va., , Baltimore. Pp.
Van Name, Willard G. (1912) Simple ascidians of the coasts of New England and neighboring British provinces., Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History 34: 439-619
Van Name, Willard G. (1921) Ascidians of the West Indian region and southeastern United States., Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 44: 283-494
Van Name, Willard G. (1945) The North and South American ascidians, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 84: 1-462
Verrill, A.E.; Smith, S.I. (1873) VIII. Report upon the invertebrate animals of Vineyard Sound and the adjacent waters, with an account of the physical characters of the region., 1 , . Pp. 1-757
Visscher, J. Paul (1927) Nature and extent of fouling of ship's bottoms., Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 43: 193-252
Wass, Melvin L. (1963) Check list of the marine invertebrates of Virginia., Special Scientific Report, Virginia Institute of Marine Science 24: 1-56
Wass, Melvin L. (1972) A Checklist of the Biota of Lower Chesapeake Bay, None :
Wass, Melvin L. (1972) A checklist of the biota of lower Chesapeake Bay, Special Scientific Report, Virginia Institute of Marine Science 65: 1-290